State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc.

763 N.E.2d 1176, 94 Ohio St. 3d 440
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 2002·No. No. 01-1624·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. The motion to strike, the amended motion to certify the record to the United States Supreme Court, and the motion to reverse and remand are denied.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 1176, 94 Ohio St. 3d 440 (Ohio 2002).

763 N.E.2d 1176 (State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway [Food Town], Inc.
100 Ohio St. 3d 169 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc.
766 N.E.2d 1003 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)