State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway [Food Town], Inc.

761 N.E.2d 37, 94 Ohio St. 3d 171
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2002·No. No. 01-1394·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Gregory T. Howard, pro se. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon and Margaret Mattimoe Sturgeon, for appellee Seaway Food Town, Ine. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and Industrial Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway [Food Town], Inc., 761 N.E.2d 37, 94 Ohio St. 3d 171 (Ohio 2002).

761 N.E.2d 37 (State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway [Food Town], Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway [Food Town], Inc.
100 Ohio St. 3d 169 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc.
764 N.E.2d 1038 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)