State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc.

2002 Ohio 340, 94 Ohio St. 3d 171

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 2002

Docket2001-1394

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2002 Ohio 340 (State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc., 2002 Ohio 340, 94 Ohio St. 3d 171 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 171.]

THE STATE EX REL. HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. SEAWAY [FOOD TOWN], INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc., 2002-Ohio-340.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-1394—Submitted November 27, 2001—Decided January 30, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1097. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Gregory T. Howard, pro se. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon and Margaret Mattimoe Sturgeon, for appellee Seaway Food Town, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and Industrial Commission. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 171.]

THE STATE EX REL. HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. SEAWAY [FOOD TOWN], INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Food Town, Inc., 2002-Ohio-340.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-1394—Submitted November 27, 2001—Decided January 30, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1097. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Gregory T. Howard, pro se. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon and Margaret Mattimoe Sturgeon, for appellee Seaway Food Town, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and Industrial Commission. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 340, 94 Ohio St. 3d 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howard-v-seaway-food-town-inc-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack