State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Corporation Commission

161 S.E. 545, 201 N.C. 819, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 112
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 23, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 545 (State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Corporation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Corporation Commission, 161 S.E. 545, 201 N.C. 819, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 112 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Otjeiam.

There is no error in the judgment in this action that the relator, W. L. Hicks, guardian of Glenn Hawkins, Joseph Hawkins and Hazel Hawkins, infants, recover of the defendants the sum of $3,000, with interest and costs.

There is error, however, in so much of the judgment as orders and adjudges that the relator has a preferred claim on the assets of the Farmers Bank and Trust Company, now in the hands of the Corporation Commission or its successor, the Commissioner of Banks of North Carolina, or of the defendant, John D. Biggs, liquidating agent. See Bank v. Corp. Com., ante, 382, 160 S. E., 360. Roebuck v. Surety *821 Company, 200 N. C., 196, 156 S. E., 531. Neither the relator nor the sureties on the bond of the Farmers Bank and Trust Company as guardian are entitled to preference in the distribution of its assets among' the creditors of the insolvent bank. The judgment as modified in accordance with this opinion is affirmed.

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masonic Foundation v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
185 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Parker v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
183 S.E. 737 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Parker v. Hood ex rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.
209 N.C. 494 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Thomas H. Briggs & Sons, Inc. v. Allen
175 S.E. 838 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Cocke v. Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.
175 S.E. 841 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
173 S.E. 601 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Hood
206 N.C. 268 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
In Re Trust Co.
168 S.E. 813 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
In re Garner Banking & Trust Co.
204 N.C. 791 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Ex Parte Michie
165 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)
Nettles v. People's Bank
165 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 545, 201 N.C. 819, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hicks-v-corporation-commission-nc-1931.