In Re Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Trust Co.

168 S.E. 813, 204 N.C. 791, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 286

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 12, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Petition by administrator for preference or priority of claim to funds in hands of liquidating agent of insolvent bank.

The Garner Banking and Trust Company had on deposit with itself to the credit of itself as executor of the estate of E. A. Johnson, deceased, the sum of $4,702.10 at the time it failed, 13 July, 1931, because of insolvency. It had commingled this deposit, as well as others of a similar nature, with the moneys in its common till.

The petitioner's application for a preference to the funds in the hands of the liquidating agent was denied, and he appeals. Affirmed on authority of Roebuck v. Surety Co., 200 N.C. 196,156 S.E. 531, Bank v. Corp. Com., 201 N.C. 381, 160 S.E. 360, Hicks v. Corp.Com., 201 N.C. 819, 161 S.E. 545.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition by administrator for preference or priority of claim to funds in hands of liquidating agent of insolvent bank.

The Garner Banking and Trust Company had on deposit with itself to the credit of itself as executor of the estate of E. A. Johnson, deceased, the sum of $4,702.10 at the time it failed, 13 July, 1931, because of insolvency. It had commingled this deposit, as well as others of a similar nature, with the moneys in its common till.

The petitioner's application for a preference to the funds in the hands of the liquidating agent was denied, and he appeals. Affirmed on authority of Roebuck v. Surety Co., 200 N.C. 196,156 S.E. 531, Bank v. Corp. Com., 201 N.C. 381, 160 S.E. 360, Hicks v. Corp.Com., 201 N.C. 819, 161 S.E. 545.

In Re Trust Co., 168 S.E. 813, 204 N.C. 791, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 286 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

168 S.E. 813 (In Re Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related