State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2013-1561
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 693 (State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland, 999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Relator’s motions to strike the motion to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings are denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-harsh-v-ringland-ohio-2013.