State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland
999 N.E.2d 704, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.
Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and relator’s motion to hold the case in abeyance, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland, 999 N.E.2d 704, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2014).
999 N.E.2d 704 (State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.