State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland
999 N.E.2d 704, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451
This text of 999 N.E.2d 704 (State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Harsh v. Ringland, 999 N.E.2d 704, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2014).
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.
Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and relator’s motion to hold the case in abeyance, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 704, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-harsh-v-ringland-ohio-2014.