State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins
This text of 418 N.E.2d 398 (State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue before this court is whether mandamus is a proper remedy for appellant to pursue the back pay allegedly due to him. There is no question, based on past decisions of this court, that mandamus is proper under these facts. See State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41; State, ex rel. Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190.
Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 N.E.2d 398, 65 Ohio St. 2d 63, 19 Ohio Op. 3d 259, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hamlin-v-collins-ohio-1981.