State Ex Rel. Greenstein v. Clifford
This text of 64 N.E.2d 62 (State Ex Rel. Greenstein v. Clifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition in prohibition, which was filed in the Court of Appeals, has attached thereto and made a part thereof a copy of the amended petition filed by Thai in the Court of Common Pleas. It is apparent from both petitions that Thai was seeking a money judgment on an agreement or a contract of employment.
Section 11215, General Code, confers on the Court of Common Pleas original jurisdiction in all civil cases where the sum or matter in dispute exceeds the jurisdiction of justices of the peace.
*80 General jurisdiction of the subject matter having-been conferred by statute upon the Court of Common Pleas, a writ of prohibition should not issue denying that court the right to determine whether such jurisdiction attaches under the facts of a particular case. Wisner v. Probate Court, 145 Ohio St., 419, 61 N. E. (2d), 889.
The writ of prohibition may not be invoked as a substitute for appeal. 32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 586, Section 24; State, ex rel. Levy, v. Savord, 143 Ohio St., 451, 55. N. E. (2d), 735.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 N.E.2d 62, 146 Ohio St. 78, 146 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78, 31 Ohio Op. 555, 1945 Ohio LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-greenstein-v-clifford-ohio-1945.