State ex rel. Graves v. Ney

718 N.E.2d 1289, 87 Ohio St. 3d 234
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1999·No. No. 99-1214·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Original actions for extraordinary relief like a writ of mandamus must be commenced by filing a complaint or petition rather than a motion. See State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 521, 522, 700 N.E.2d 1258, 1259.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Graves v. Ney, 718 N.E.2d 1289, 87 Ohio St. 3d 234 (Ohio 1999).

718 N.E.2d 1289 (State ex rel. Graves v. Ney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malone v. Lane
2002 Ohio 4908 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
740 N.E.2d 1100 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
2001 Ohio 231 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Graves v. Ney
1999 Ohio 35 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)