State ex rel. Gerstein v. Stedman
238 So. 2d 615, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2679
Opinions
Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that no harmful error was committed by the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, here under review. Accordingly, we adopt the majority opinion authored by Judge Hendry as the opinion of this court and the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Gerstein v. Stedman, 238 So. 2d 615, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2679 (Fla. 1970).
238 So. 2d 615 (State ex rel. Gerstein v. Stedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WILLIAM PAUL DABBS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. v. MONICA OLIVARES, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ALBERTO OLIVARES and RANDOLPH SAPP
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Aberdeen Property Owners Ass'n v. Bristol Lakes Homeowners Ass'n
8 So. 3d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Adams v. Shiver
890 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Delissio v. Delissio
821 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Dougherty v. State
746 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Torres v. State
697 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Hayes v. State
686 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Eason v. Colbath
586 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Bryant
48 Fla. Supp. 70 (Palm Beach County Circuit Court, 1978)
State v. Wolfe
249 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)