State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula

714 N.E.2d 924, 86 Ohio St. 3d 301
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 1999·No. No. 99-424·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Sutula had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Fuller’s second petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 529, 530, 705 N.E.2d 1226, 1227.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula, 714 N.E.2d 924, 86 Ohio St. 3d 301 (Ohio 1999).

714 N.E.2d 924 (State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Harding
2022 Ohio 3595 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Brown
2014 Ohio 2988 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Hicks
2012 Ohio 3985 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Fields
2011 Ohio 5513 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. King
2011 Ohio 4529 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Peeples, 88747 (8-9-2007)
2007 Ohio 4055 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Byrd
762 N.E.2d 1043 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
State ex rel. Reese v. Lisotto
2000 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula
1999 Ohio 164 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)