State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm.

2001 Ohio 1894, 93 Ohio St. 3d 653

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 2001

Docket2001-0965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 1894 (State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 1894, 93 Ohio St. 3d 653 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 653.]

THE STATE EX REL. FIRSTENERGY/TOLEDO EDISON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1894.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-965—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided December 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1021. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., not participating. __________________ Roetzel & Andress, Robert E. Blackham, Timothy J. Webster and Jonathan A. Good, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Daniel M. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Pheils & Wisniewski and Michael D. Portnoy, for appellee JoAnn Taylor. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 653.]

THE STATE EX REL. FIRSTENERGY/TOLEDO EDISON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Firstenergy/Toledo Edison v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1894.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-965—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided December 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1021. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., not participating. __________________ Roetzel & Andress, Robert E. Blackham, Timothy J. Webster and Jonathan A. Good, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Daniel M. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Pheils & Wisniewski and Michael D. Portnoy, for appellee JoAnn Taylor. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1894, 93 Ohio St. 3d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-firstenergytoledo-edison-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack