State ex rel. Evans & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. Lubke
85 Mo. 338
Opinion
The circuit court properly granted an appeal and supersedeas in the case of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, for the reasons given [339] in that case. But wh.eth.er that appeal was properly granted or not, does not affect the disposition to be made oí this mandamus proceeding. Such a proceeding is not allowable where the party has a remedy by appeal or writ of error. Blecker v. St. Louis Law Com., 30 Mo. Ill.
The judgment of the court of appeals is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Evans & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. Lubke, 85 Mo. 338 (Mo. 1884).
85 Mo. 338 (State ex rel. Evans & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. Lubke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Kelley v. Mitchell
595 S.W.2d 261 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1980)
Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Co.
200 N.W. 749 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
State Ex Rel. Case v. Seehorn
223 S.W. 664 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)
State ex rel. Lamport v. Robinson
165 S.W. 997 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
State ex rel. Wattenbarger v. Lamb
160 S.W. 55 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
State ex rel. Spring River Electric Power Co. v. Thurman
132 S.W. 1157 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State ex rel. Hilleman v. Fort
79 S.W. 167 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
State ex rel. Holton v. Walker
85 Mo. App. 247 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
State ex rel. Herriford v. McKee
51 S.W. 421 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
State ex rel. Carroll v. County Court
109 Mo. 248 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Seay
23 Mo. App. 623 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
State ex rel. Phelan v. Engelmann
86 Mo. 551 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)