State ex rel. Earls v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 763 N.E.2d 608 (State ex rel. Earls v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franklin App. No. 00AP-1201. On January 18, 2002, appellant filed a merit brief and supplement to the brief and Robert S. Corker filed a notice of appearance on behalf of appellant. Robert S. Corker is admitted to practice in Ohio but is not currently registered pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI. Whereas Robert S. Corker is not registered active as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Robert S. Corker be stricken from appellant’s brief and supplement to the brief, and he shall not be permitted to appear in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
763 N.E.2d 608, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-earls-v-indus-comm-ohio-2002.