State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
719 N.E.2d 545, 87 Ohio St. 3d 259
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. Jackson v. Rose (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell, 719 N.E.2d 545, 87 Ohio St. 3d 259 (Ohio 1999).
719 N.E.2d 545 (State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Waver v. Gallagher, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2004)
2004 Ohio 4355 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Bradford v. Moore
2000 Ohio 25 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell
1999 Ohio 54 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)