State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan

696 N.E.2d 581, 82 Ohio St. 3d 405, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1866
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 29, 1998·No. No. 98-227·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 279, 658 N.E.2d 723, 724.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan, 696 N.E.2d 581, 82 Ohio St. 3d 405, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1866 (Ohio 1998).

696 N.E.2d 581 (State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
1999 Ohio 232 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
716 N.E.2d 1147 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Forsyth v. Brigner
1999 Ohio 105 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas
1999 Ohio 392 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga County Court
708 N.E.2d 718 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan
1998 Ohio 514 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)