State ex rel. Drew v. Vinton Cty. Bd. of Elections

661 N.E.2d 1117, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1416, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3350
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 1996·No. 96-349·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed based on laches.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Drew v. Vinton Cty. Bd. of Elections, 661 N.E.2d 1117, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1416, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3350 (Ohio 1996).

661 N.E.2d 1117 (State ex rel. Drew v. Vinton Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related