State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino

2014 Ohio 4967, 23 N.E.3d 1171, 141 Ohio St. 3d 329
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2014·No. 2014-1351·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration and pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 12.04, it is ordered by the court that a peremptory writ of mandamus is granted, and the Special Commission is ordered to proceed with its meeting as set forth in R.C. 3.16(C)(2), and to abide by all provisions in that section.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the motion to transport the recordings of the special commission under seal to this court is denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino, 2014 Ohio 4967, 23 N.E.3d 1171, 141 Ohio St. 3d 329 (Ohio 2014).

2014 Ohio 4967 (State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related