State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino

2014 Ohio 4967, 23 N.E.3d 1171, 141 Ohio St. 3d 329
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 2014
Docket2014-1351
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ohio 4967 (State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. DeWine v. Special Commission Convened Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 3.16 Concerning Sciortino, 2014 Ohio 4967, 23 N.E.3d 1171, 141 Ohio St. 3d 329 (Ohio 2014).

Opinions

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration and pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 12.04, it is ordered by the court that a peremptory writ of mandamus is granted, and the Special Commission is ordered to proceed with its meeting as set forth in R.C. 3.16(C)(2), and to abide by all provisions in that section.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the motion to transport the recordings of the special commission under seal to this court is denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 4967, 23 N.E.3d 1171, 141 Ohio St. 3d 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dewine-v-special-commission-convened-pursuant-to-ohio-ohio-2014.