State ex rel. DeSalvo v. May Co.
This text of 2000 Ohio 313 (State ex rel. DeSalvo v. May Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 231.]
THE STATE EX REL. DESALVO, APPELLANT, v. MAY COMPANY, D.B.A. KAUFMANN’S DEPARTMENT STORE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. DeSalvo v. May Co., 2000-Ohio-313.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1339—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-986. __________________ Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Francis X. Gardner, for appellee May Co. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 313, 88 Ohio St. 3d 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-desalvo-v-may-co-ohio-2000.