State ex rel. Davis v. City of Seattle

222 P. 901, 128 Wash. 701, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 523
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 1924·No. No. 17655·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 125 Wash. 660, 216 Pac. 858, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Davis v. City of Seattle, 222 P. 901, 128 Wash. 701, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 523 (Wash. 1924).

222 P. 901 (State ex rel. Davis v. City of Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkinson v. Sample
36 Wash. App. 266 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1983)
Jackson v. Colagrossi
313 P.2d 697 (Washington Supreme Court, 1957)
Darst v. Meduna
130 P.2d 361 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. Aukamp
20 P.2d 851 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)
A. F. Anderson Estate, Inc. v. Hoffman
18 P.2d 5 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)
Mason v. Madson
4 P.2d 475 (Montana Supreme Court, 1931)
Grunbaum Brothers Furniture Co. v. Humphrey Investment Corp.
258 P. 517 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)
Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. West Market Grocery Co.
21 F.2d 309 (Second Circuit, 1927)
Platt v. Bradner Co.
230 P. 633 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)