State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 2011 Ohio 4895 (State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm., 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-4895.]
THE STATE EX REL. DAIMLER CHRYSLER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm., 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-4895.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2009-2058—Submitted August 8, 2011—Decided September 28, 2011.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 08AP-1017, 2009-Ohio-5778. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Larrimer and Larrimer and Thomas L. Reitz, for appellant. Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A., David C. Korte, Michelle D. Bach, and Joshua R. Lounsbury, for appellee Daimler Chrysler Corp. Mike DeWine, Attorney General, and LaTawnda Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 4895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-daimler-chrysler-v-indus-comm-ohio-2011.