State ex rel. Dahlman v. Piper
This text of 69 N.W. 1150 (State ex rel. Dahlman v. Piper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an application for mandamus against the secretary of state to determine the validity of the nomination of R. S. Proudfit, and the right to have his name printed upon the official ballot as the nominee of the democratic party for congress in the fifth congressional district in this state. Two certificates of nomination of candidates for said office were filed with the secretary of state, both upon their, face in apparent conformity with the requirements of the election law, and each purporting to be a certificate of nomination by the democratic party of that congressional district, in one of which R. D. Sutherland was named as the candidate, and the other certificate R. S. Proudfit was stated to be the nominee. [40]*40The respondent overruled the objections filed to the last named certificate. The facts and the questions involved are identical with those in State v. Piper, 50 Neb., 25, and following the decision therein, the writ must be denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 N.W. 1150, 50 Neb. 39, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dahlman-v-piper-neb-1896.