State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner

923 N.E.2d 625, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Ohio St. 3d 1503
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2010·No. 2010-0421·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of New Models’ motions for protective order and for sanctions, and the motion for protective order of LetOhioVote.org,

It is ordered by the court that the motions for protective order are granted, and the motion for sanctions will be considered at the time of the merits determination.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would deny the motions for protective order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner, 923 N.E.2d 625, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2010).

923 N.E.2d 625 (State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.