State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner

922 N.E.2d 967, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1503
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 2010
Docket2010-0421
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 922 N.E.2d 967 (State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner, 922 N.E.2d 967, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1503 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6: The respondent shall file an answer to the complaint within seven days of the date of this entry. The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within ten days of the date of this entry; relators shall file a brief within five days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within ten days after the filing of relators’ brief; and relators may file a reply brief within five days after filing of respondent’s brief.

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6, the issuance of this alternative writ stays the proceedings that relator seeks to prohibit until there is a final determination by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner
2010 Ohio 1895 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 N.E.2d 967, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cummings-v-brunner-ohio-2010.