Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley

State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley

25 A. 260, 55 N.J.L. 107, 26 Vroom 107, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 25 A. 260 (State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley, 25 A. 260, 55 N.J.L. 107, 26 Vroom 107, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1892).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Immediately after the passage of the resolution of March 22d, 1892, considered in Markley v: The Borough-of Cape May Point, the council of the borough appointed the-relator to fill the alleged vacancy in the office of borough collector, and he now asks for a mandamus- directing the respondent to deliver to him the official money and property.

[108]*108As we have adjudged the resolution to be illegal, it follows that the respondent was still lawfully entitled to the office, =and the appointment of the relator was invalid. Of course, •therefore, the mandamus cannot be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walter v. Walter
433 S.W.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Franzen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
51 F. Supp. 578 (D. New Jersey, 1943)
McArthur v. Hall
169 S.W.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Owens v. Bentley
14 A.2d 391 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1940)
Richard v. Richard
1935 OK 436 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Cooper v. Cooper
168 A. 153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
In re the Estate of Erlanger
145 Misc. 1 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
State v. Wheeler
161 P. 373 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Summerville v. Summerville
72 P. 84 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Heminway v. Miller
91 N.W. 428 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1902)
In re Estate of James
3 Coffey 130 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A. 260, 55 N.J.L. 107, 26 Vroom 107, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-corwin-v-markley-nj-1892.