State ex rel. Corrigan v. Wheeler

271 N.E.2d 862, 27 Ohio St. 2d 9, 56 Ohio Op. 2d 5, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 465
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1971
DocketNo. 71-259
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 271 N.E.2d 862 (State ex rel. Corrigan v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Corrigan v. Wheeler, 271 N.E.2d 862, 27 Ohio St. 2d 9, 56 Ohio Op. 2d 5, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 465 (Ohio 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The judicial power of this state is vested in a Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals, Courts of Common Pleas, and such other courts inferior to the Supreme Court as may from time to time be established by law.” Article IV, Section 1, Ohio Constitution. Further, Article IV, Section 2 grants to this court original jurisdiction in certain enumerated types of action one of which is “quo warranto.”

While Section V of the East Cleveland City Charter is a grant to the City Commission to pass on the qualification of its own members, this case does not involve a review of action taken thereunder. Cf. State, ex rel. Platz, v. Mucci (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 60. The grant of authority to the City Commission cannot result in a diminution of the constitutional grant of judicial power to this court. This court’s original jurisdiction in quo warranto cannot be diminished by a city charter. State, ex rel. Turner, v. Fender (1922), 106 Ohio St. 191.

There is no dispute here that subsequent to his election to the City Commission of East Cleveland respondent became employed by the Auditor of Cuyahoga County. The employment by the Auditor’s office constitutes a violation of the charter in that this second public employment is prohibited thereby and does not fall within the exceptions of “notary public or member of the State Militia.” Thus it falls within the forfeiture provision of the city charter.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is overruled, and, re- ' spondent not desiring to plead further, judgment of ouster is issued.

Judgment accordingly.

O’Neill, C. J„ Schneider, Herbert, Dun caw, Corrigan, Stern and Leaoh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. East Cleveland Democratic Club, Inc. v. Bibb
470 N.E.2d 257 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1984)
Hitt v. Tressler
447 N.E.2d 1299 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)
State ex rel. Corrigan v. Gillon
413 N.E.2d 828 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State ex rel. Highland Heights v. Kee
327 N.E.2d 770 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975)
State ex rel. Cain v. Kay
309 N.E.2d 860 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 N.E.2d 862, 27 Ohio St. 2d 9, 56 Ohio Op. 2d 5, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-corrigan-v-wheeler-ohio-1971.