Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden

State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden

99 N.E.3d 423, 2018 Ohio 2154, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1487
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 2018·No. 2017–1398·Published

Opinion

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted and the following *424briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05. The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief.

O'Donnell, Fischer, and DeGenaro, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden, 99 N.E.3d 423, 2018 Ohio 2154, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2018).

99 N.E.3d 423 (State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.