State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden

94 N.E.3d 576, 2018 Ohio 1131, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1430

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 2018

Docket2017–1398

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.E.3d 576 (State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden, 94 N.E.3d 576, 2018 Ohio 1131, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1430 (Ohio 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. Pursuant to R.C. 2710.06(B)(l), the court has been notified that the parties in each of the following cases have reached settlements. These cases are returned to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01. Within 60 days, the filing party in each case shall file either an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement. Each case will be dismissed for want of prosecution if an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement is not filed within 60 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. Pursuant to R.C. 2710.06(B)(l), the court has been notified that the parties in each of the following cases have reached settlements. These cases are returned to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01. Within 60 days, the filing party in each case shall file either an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement. Each case will be dismissed for want of prosecution if an application for dismissal or a notice of failure of settlement is not filed within 60 days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.E.3d 576, 2018 Ohio 1131, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cordell-v-paden-ohio-2018.