State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Schiffner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Schiffner

1940 OK 411, 105 P.2d 1041, 188 Okla. 49, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 371

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 1, 1940

DocketNo. 29217.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1940 OK 411 (State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Schiffner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Schiffner, 1940 OK 411, 105 P.2d 1041, 188 Okla. 49, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 371 (Okla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from an order denying the confirmation of sale in. a foreclosure proceeding. On the 23rd day of February, 1940, plaintiff in error filed, brief, and the authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. No brief has been filed by the defendant in error and no excuse has been offered for such failure. As stated in Watkins v. Holcombe, 170 Okla. 513, 41 P. 2d 59, it is not the duty of the court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to set aside the order denying the confirmation of sale and to enter an order confirming the sale.

BAYLESS, C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from an order denying the confirmation of sale in. a foreclosure proceeding. On the 23rd day of February, 1940, plaintiff in error filed, brief, and the authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. No brief has been filed by the defendant in error and no excuse has been offered for such failure. As stated in Watkins v. Holcombe, 170 Okla. 513, 41 P. 2d 59, it is not the duty of the court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to set aside the order denying the confirmation of sale and to enter an order confirming the sale.

BAYLESS, C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1940 OK 411, 105 P.2d 1041, 188 Okla. 49, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-comrs-of-the-land-office-v-schiffner-okla-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack