Peppers v. City of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Peppers v. City of Enid

1943 OK 180, 141 P.2d 82, 192 Okla. 418, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 185

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 11, 1943

DocketNo. 30344.

StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK 180 (Peppers v. City of Enid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peppers v. City of Enid, 1943 OK 180, 141 P.2d 82, 192 Okla. 418, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 185 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has appealed from an order of the trial court denying an injunction against enforcement of a city ordinance of the city of Enid. On the 30th day of September, 1941, he filed his brief and the authorities therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. No brief has been filed by the defendants in error and no excuse given for the failure to do so. Under such circumstances, as stated in State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Schiffner, 188 Okla. 49, 105 P. 2d 1041, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The- cause is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has appealed from an order of the trial court denying an injunction against enforcement of a city ordinance of the city of Enid. On the 30th day of September, 1941, he filed his brief and the authorities therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. No brief has been filed by the defendants in error and no excuse given for the failure to do so. Under such circumstances, as stated in State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Schiffner, 188 Okla. 49, 105 P. 2d 1041, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The- cause is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK 180, 141 P.2d 82, 192 Okla. 418, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peppers-v-city-of-enid-okla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack