STATE EX REL. COLEMAN v. McCaughtry

2006 WI 121, 723 N.W.2d 424, 297 Wis. 2d 587, 2006 Wisc. LEXIS 725

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. Marvin Coleman, the petitioner, moves the court to clarify or to reconsider its decision in the above captioned case.

¶ 2. We deny Coleman's motion for reconsideration.

¶ 3. However, we do clarify our opinion to facilitate its application. Accordingly, we amend footnote 13 to read as follows:

At the subsequent fact finding hearing in this habeas corpus proceeding, laches may be considered in regard to its effect on any potential issues, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, suppression or a retrial of the crimes of which Coleman stands convicted.