State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman
This text of 2010 Ohio 4987 (State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Kyle L. Clutter, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Crawford County Court of Common Pleas and Judge Russell B. Wiseman of that court, to resentence him. Clutter has already unsuccessfully sought resentencing by raising a similar claim for writs of mandamus and procedendo. See State ex rel. Clutter v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Mar. 20, 2009), Crawford App. No. 3-09-01. As the court of appeals correctly concluded, res judicata thus barred Clutter from instituting a successive writ action. See State ex rel. Tate v. Calabrese, 125 Ohio St.3d 28, 2010-Ohio-1431, 925 N.E.2d 962.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 Ohio 4987, 127 Ohio St. 3d 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clutter-v-wiseman-ohio-2010.