State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman

2010 Ohio 4987, 127 Ohio St. 3d 214
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 20, 2010·No. 2010-0931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Kyle L. Clutter, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Crawford County Court of Common Pleas and Judge Russell B. Wiseman of that court, to resentence him. Clutter has already unsuccessfully sought resentencing by raising a similar claim for writs of mandamus and procedendo. See State ex rel. Clutter v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Mar. 20, 2009), Crawford App. No. 3-09-01. As the court of appeals correctly concluded, res judicata thus barred Clutter from instituting a successive writ action. See State ex rel. Tate v. Calabrese, 125 Ohio St.3d 28, 2010-Ohio-1431, 925 N.E.2d 962.

Judgment affirmed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman, 2010 Ohio 4987, 127 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 4987 (State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Pankey v. D'Apolito
2013 Ohio 2873 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher
2012 Ohio 563 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman
939 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)