State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)

2016 Ohio 8015, 71 N.E.3d 1034, 148 Ohio St. 3d 553

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 7, 2016

Docket2015-1204

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 8015 (State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8015, 71 N.E.3d 1034, 148 Ohio St. 3d 553 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8015.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-8015 THE STATE EX REL. THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL, APPELLEES. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8015.] Oral argument canceled, court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. (No. 2015-1204—Submitted November 29, 2016—Decided December 7, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 13AP-1069, 2015-Ohio-2165. __________________ {¶ 1} It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled for Wednesday, January 11, 2017, is canceled. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-7988, ___ N.E.3d ___. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent and urge oral argument in this case for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. _________________ Barbara A. Langhenry, Cleveland Director of Law, and Elizabeth M. Williamson, Assistant Director of Law, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Shapiro, Marnecheck & Palnik, Matthew Palnik, and Elizabeth M. LaPorte, for appellee Jacqueline Johnson. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8015.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-8015 THE STATE EX REL. THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL, APPELLEES. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8015.] Oral argument canceled, court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. (No. 2015-1204—Submitted November 29, 2016—Decided December 7, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 13AP-1069, 2015-Ohio-2165. __________________ {¶ 1} It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled for Wednesday, January 11, 2017, is canceled. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-7988, ___ N.E.3d ___. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent and urge oral argument in this case for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. _________________ Barbara A. Langhenry, Cleveland Director of Law, and Elizabeth M. Williamson, Assistant Director of Law, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Shapiro, Marnecheck & Palnik, Matthew Palnik, and Elizabeth M. LaPorte, for appellee Jacqueline Johnson. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 8015, 71 N.E.3d 1034, 148 Ohio St. 3d 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cleveland-v-indus-comm-slip-opinion-ohio-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack