State ex rel. Clark v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Clark v. Hunt

329 So. 2d 467, 1976 La. LEXIS 4710

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 23, 1976

DocketNo. 57524

StatusPublished

This text of 329 So. 2d 467 (State ex rel. Clark v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Clark v. Hunt, 329 So. 2d 467, 1976 La. LEXIS 4710 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Norman Clark applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Daniel W. LeBlanc, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of April, 1976 the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in dupli-case, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 25th day of June, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Norman Clark applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition.

Granted. (See Order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Daniel W. LeBlanc, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of April, 1976 the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in dupli-case, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 25th day of June, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 So. 2d 467, 1976 La. LEXIS 4710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-clark-v-hunt-la-1976.