Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.

349 U.S. 44, 75 S. Ct. 576, 99 L. Ed. 2d 866, 99 L. Ed. 866, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1400, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 905
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 11, 1955
DocketNO. 191
StatusPublished
Cited by94 cases

This text of 349 U.S. 44 (Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44, 75 S. Ct. 576, 99 L. Ed. 2d 866, 99 L. Ed. 866, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1400, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 905 (1955).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In these cases Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, that [45]*45such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The Phillips case, therefore, controls this one.

We disagree with the contention of the appellees that Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co., 340 U. S. 179, and Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma, 340 U. S. 190, are applicable here. In those cases we were dealing with constitutional questions and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Omar Gomaa Orabi v. Attorney General United States
738 F.3d 535 (Third Circuit, 2014)
State v. Reliant Energy, Inc.
289 P.3d 1186 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2012)
Planes v. Holder
652 F.3d 991 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Carey
716 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D. Maine, 2010)
Abreu v. Holder
378 F. App'x 59 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp.
308 S.W.3d 843 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2010)
McLeod v. Mukasey
287 F. App'x 562 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Simpson v. Spencer
372 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D. Massachusetts, 2005)
United States v. Germain Florentino
393 F.3d 270 (First Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria
374 F.3d 440 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Da Rosa Silva v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
263 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
Montenegro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
245 F. Supp. 2d 936 (C.D. Illinois, 2003)
Schilling v. Iowa Department of Transportation
646 N.W.2d 69 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2002)
Griffiths v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
243 F.3d 45 (First Circuit, 2001)
Arthur M. Clawson v. United States
52 F.3d 806 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Wilson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
43 F.3d 211 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Clawson
842 F. Supp. 428 (D. Oregon, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 U.S. 44, 75 S. Ct. 576, 99 L. Ed. 2d 866, 99 L. Ed. 866, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1400, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natural-gas-pipeline-co-v-panoma-corp-scotus-1955.