Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.
This text of 349 U.S. 44 (Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In these cases Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, that [45]*45such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The Phillips case, therefore, controls this one.
We disagree with the contention of the appellees that Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co., 340 U. S. 179, and Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma, 340 U. S. 190, are applicable here. In those cases we were dealing with constitutional questions and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
349 U.S. 44, 75 S. Ct. 576, 99 L. Ed. 2d 866, 99 L. Ed. 866, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1400, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natural-gas-pipeline-co-v-panoma-corp-scotus-1955.