State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 207, 82 Ohio St. 3d 494

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 5, 1998

Docket1996-0836

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 1998 Ohio 207 (State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 207, 82 Ohio St. 3d 494 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 494.]

THE STATE EX REL. BROWNE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-207.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-836—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided August 5, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD01-59. __________________ John Anthony Bull, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 494.]

THE STATE EX REL. BROWNE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Browne v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-207.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-836—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided August 5, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD01-59. __________________ John Anthony Bull, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 207, 82 Ohio St. 3d 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-browne-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack