State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes
This text of 2006 Ohio 6523 (State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes, 112 Ohio St.3d 153, 2006-Ohio-6523.]
THE STATE EX REL. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. RHODES, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes, 112 Ohio St.3d 153, 2006-Ohio-6523.] Public records — Mandamus sought to compel respondent to release public records to inmate — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Russell v. Thornton. (No. 2006-1549 — Submitted November 14, 2006 — Decided December 27, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hancock County, No. 5-05-25, 2006-Ohio-3394. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Russell v. Thornton, 111 Ohio St.3d 409, 2006-Ohio-5858, 856 N.E.2d 966. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. __________________ Frank C. Brown Jr., pro se. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2006 Ohio 6523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brown-v-rhodes-ohio-2006.