State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister

29 So. 2d 699, 158 Fla. 662
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 So. 2d 699 (State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister, 29 So. 2d 699, 158 Fla. 662 (Fla. 1947).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

There is no order allowing this appeal from a judgment in habeas corpus as required by Section 79.11, Fla. Stat. 1941, F.S.A., therefore we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment arid the appeal is dismissed upon authority of Ex parte Finch, 15 Fla. 630; Wright et al. v. State, 32 Fla. 472, 14 So. 43; State ex rel Wilson v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. 2d. 697.

Appeal dismissed.

THOMAS, C.J., BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HARRY N. SANDLER, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Callahan v. Michell
170 So. 2d 290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Griffith v. State ex rel. Crownover
152 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
McDonald v. Frates
133 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Freeman v. Blackburn
92 So. 2d 262 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 So. 2d 699, 158 Fla. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brister-v-brister-fla-1947.