State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister

29 So. 2d 699, 158 Fla. 662
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 28, 1947·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

There is no order allowing this appeal from a judgment in habeas corpus as required by Section 79.11, Fla. Stat. 1941, F.S.A., therefore we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment arid the appeal is dismissed upon authority of Ex parte Finch, 15 Fla. 630; Wright et al. v. State, 32 Fla. 472, 14 So. 43; State ex rel Wilson v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. 2d. 697.

Appeal dismissed.

THOMAS, C.J., BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HARRY N. SANDLER, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister, 29 So. 2d 699, 158 Fla. 662 (Fla. 1947).

29 So. 2d 699 (State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Callahan v. Michell
170 So. 2d 290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Griffith v. State ex rel. Crownover
152 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
McDonald v. Frates
133 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Freeman v. Blackburn
92 So. 2d 262 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)