Ex parte Finch

15 Fla. 630
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Fla. 630 (Ex parte Finch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Finch, 15 Fla. 630 (Fla. 1876).

Opinion

WESTCOTT, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Whether a writ of error shall issue from this court to bring up the record of a judgment in a case of habeas corpus is a matter of discretion with the court. It does not issue as a matter of course, either from the court or the clerk’s office. This discretion cannot be intelligently exercised upon the mere motion of the party seeking the writ without any statement of the case which he proposes to present. A petition setting forth the nature of the case, accompanied by a certified copy of the record of the judgment, is the proper basis of a motion in this court for the writ. This motion is an ese parte proceeding, and unless so directed by the court, there is no necessity id)'' notice to the adverse party. This [633]*633was the practice adopted in the case of ex parte Edwards, 11 Fla., 174. An examination of the papers will shoyv'that. that case was presented upon petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Brister v. Brister
29 So. 2d 699 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Fla. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-finch-fla-1876.