State ex rel. Bray v. Russell

709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1360

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Bray v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Ohio St. 3d 132 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1999·No. 98-2694·Published

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA98-06-068. On request for oral argument. Request granted.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, on motion to consolidate with 99-273, Haddad v. Russell. Motion granted.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would dismiss 98-2694 as moot. F.E. Sweeney, J., would deny the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Bray v. Russell, 709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1360 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

709 N.E.2d 172 (State ex rel. Bray v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.