State ex rel. Bray v. Russell

709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1360
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1999
Docket98-2694
StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 172 (State ex rel. Bray v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Bray v. Russell, 709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1360 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA98-06-068. On request for oral argument. Request granted.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, on motion to consolidate with 99-273, Haddad v. Russell. Motion granted.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would dismiss 98-2694 as moot. F.E. Sweeney, J., would deny the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bray-v-russell-ohio-1999.