State Ex Rel. Beck v. Erickson

221 N.W. 245, 175 Minn. 393, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 898
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 12, 1928
DocketNo. 27,124.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 221 N.W. 245 (State Ex Rel. Beck v. Erickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Beck v. Erickson, 221 N.W. 245, 175 Minn. 393, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 898 (Mich. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the petition of Howard H. Beck setting forth, among other things: That a certificate of nomination as a candidate for the office of representative from the thirty-first representative district at the general election to be held in November, 1928, had been issued to one John M. Nelson by the canvassing board of the county of Hennepin; that the county auditor of that county ivas about to place this name upon the official ballot as a candidate for such office at that election; and further setting forth that John M. Nelson was not a resident of the thirty-first legislative district and for more than six months last past had not been a resident thereof, this court issued an order requiring the county auditor to desist and refrain from placing the name of John M. Nelson upon the official ballot as a candidate for the office of representative from the thirty-first legislative district at the next general election or show cause why he should not be ordered to refrain from so doing: The order to show cause and the moving papers were served upon the county auditor and also upon Mr. Nelson. The county auditor did not appear nor make any return to the order to show cause, but Mr. Nelson appeared and filed affidavits asserting that he was a resident of the thirty-first legislative district.

Thereupon a referee was appointed to take and report the evidence.' From the evidence taken and reported by the referee, the court finds that John M. Nelson is not a resident of the thirty-first legislative district and for more than one year last past has not been a resident thereof.

The constitution provides:

“Senators and representatives shall be qualified voters of the state, and shall have resided one year in the state and six months immediately preceding the election in the district from which they are elected.” Art. 4, § 25.

*395 As Mr. Nelson is not a resident of the thirty-first legislative district, he is not eligible to be elected as a representative from that district, and the county auditor will omit his name from the official ballot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comer v. Ashe
514 S.W.2d 730 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1974)
Moe v. Alsop
180 N.W.2d 255 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1970)
State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Dubuque
413 P.2d 972 (Washington Supreme Court, 1966)
State Ex Rel. McGrath v. Erickson
281 N.W. 366 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)
Fletcher v. Scott
277 N.W. 270 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 N.W. 245, 175 Minn. 393, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-beck-v-erickson-minn-1928.