State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield
This text of 58 S.E.2d 637 (State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of nonsuit was improvidently entered. It was made to appear from the admissions in the answer and the evidence offered by the relators that 1 July, 1949, the defendant was elected by the Board of Commissioners of Granite Falls as chief of police of that town, which office he is now holding, and that defendant is not a qualified voter therein. It was also admitted that relators are residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers of Granite Falls.
The office of chief of police of an incorporated town, as Granite Falls is admitted to be, is a public office. Foard v. Hall, 111 N.C. 369, 16 S.E. 420. The relators had a right to institute this action for the cause set out in the complaint. Bouldin v. Davis, 197 N.C. 731, 150 S.E. 507; Midgett v. Gray, 158 N.C. 133, 73 S.E. 791. The statute (G.S. 160-25) provides that “No person shall be mayor, commissioner, intendant of police, alderman or other chief officer of any city or town unless he shall be a qualified voter therein.” This statute, said Chief Justice Clark in Foard v. Hall, supra, “embraces the office of chief of police.”
The judgment of nonsuit must be vacated.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 S.E.2d 637, 231 N.C. 663, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-barlow-v-benfield-nc-1950.