State ex rel. Agar v. Conrad
This text of 2000 Ohio 24 (State ex rel. Agar v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 74.]
THE STATE EX REL. AGAR, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Agar v. Conrad, 2000-Ohio-24.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-514—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1595. __________________ Koltak & Gibson, L.L.P., Ronald J. Koltak and Peter J. Gibson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Sandee E. Blabolil, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 24, 90 Ohio St. 3d 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-agar-v-conrad-ohio-2000.