State Division of Human Rights v. Wiesner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Wiesner

112 A.D.2d 786, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56029

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 786 (State Division of Human Rights v. Wiesner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. Wiesner, 112 A.D.2d 786, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The complaint filed with the State Division of Human Rights alleges discrimination in employment on account of sex. We find that the investigation [787]*787conducted by the Division was sufficient and that its determination of no probable cause has a rational basis in the record (see, State Div. of Human Rights v County of Erie, 107 AD2d 1042; State Div. of Human Rights v Stanmor Liq. Co., 107 AD2d 1056; see also, Matter of Totem Taxi v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 65 NY2d 300). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The complaint filed with the State Division of Human Rights alleges discrimination in employment on account of sex. We find that the investigation [787]*787conducted by the Division was sufficient and that its determination of no probable cause has a rational basis in the record (see, State Div. of Human Rights v County of Erie, 107 AD2d 1042; State Div. of Human Rights v Stanmor Liq. Co., 107 AD2d 1056; see also, Matter of Totem Taxi v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 65 NY2d 300). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 786, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-wiesner-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack