New York State Division of Human Rights v. Filtration Products Group of Snyder-General Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York State Division of Human Rights v. Filtration Products Group of Snyder-General Corp.

198 A.D.2d 761, 605 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11341

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s denial of petitioner’s motion insofar as it sought reargument is not properly before us because no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Lindsay v Funtime, Inc., 184 AD2d 1036; Pennino v Lasersurge, Inc., 178 AD2d 939). The court properly denied the motion insofar as it sought renewal. The additional evidence supporting the motion was not newly discovered and petitioner did not provide a valid excuse for his failure to submit that evidence with the petition (see, Lindsay v Funtime, Inc., supra; Town of Niagara v City of Niagara Falls, 175 AD2d 571, 572). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J. — Reargument and Renewal.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s denial of petitioner’s motion insofar as it sought reargument is not properly before us because no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Lindsay v Funtime, Inc., 184 AD2d 1036; Pennino v Lasersurge, Inc., 178 AD2d 939). The court properly denied the motion insofar as it sought renewal. The additional evidence supporting the motion was not newly discovered and petitioner did not provide a valid excuse for his failure to submit that evidence with the petition (see, Lindsay v Funtime, Inc., supra; Town of Niagara v City of Niagara Falls, 175 AD2d 571, 572). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J. — Reargument and Renewal.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

New York State Division of Human Rights v. Filtration Products Group of Snyder-General Corp., 198 A.D.2d 761, 605 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 761 (New York State Division of Human Rights v. Filtration Products Group of Snyder-General Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related