State Division of Human Rights v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department
521 N.E.2d 433, 70 N.Y.2d 974, 526 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 79, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,266, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 243
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (119 AD2d 1006).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Titone and Bellacosa. Judge Hancock, Jr., dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judges Kaye and Alexander concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Division of Human Rights v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department, 521 N.E.2d 433, 70 N.Y.2d 974, 526 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 79, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,266, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 243 (N.Y. 1988).
521 N.E.2d 433 (State Division of Human Rights v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Ghemawat v. New York State Division of Human Rights
240 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Rider v. Pennsylvania
850 F.2d 982 (Third Circuit, 1988)
Rider v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
850 F.2d 982 (Third Circuit, 1988)