State Division of Human Rights v. Greif Bros.

71 A.D.2d 832, 419 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13059
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 832 (State Division of Human Rights v. Greif Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Division of Human Rights v. Greif Bros., 71 A.D.2d 832, 419 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

—Petition unanimously granted, without costs, order of appeal board annulled, on the law, and determination of the State Division of Human Rights reinstated and confirmed. Memorandum: Greif Brothers Corp. petitions pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, seeking to review an order of the respondent State Human Rights Appeal Board which reversed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing the Dixon complaint on the ground of no probable cause to believe that Greif Brothers Corp. engaged in a discriminatory practice. Our review confirms that there was [833]*833sufficient evidence to support the determination of no probable cause for the complaint. Since there was a rational basis for the determination reached by the State Division of Human Rights, the appeal board was obligated by statute to affirm (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 7, par e; State Div. of Human Rights v New York State Drug Abuse Control Comm., 59 AD2d 332). The board may not exceed the limited scope of its review and substitute its judgment for that of the division (Putnam Community Hosp. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 63 AD2d 1017). The investigation was thorough; the determination was not arbitrary or capricious; and thus, the appeal board erred in reversing the commissioner’s determination and remanding the complaint to him for further investigation (State Div. of Human Rights v New York State Drug Abuse Control Comm., supra). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Schnepp, Callahan, Witmer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York State Education Department v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
92 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 832, 419 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-greif-bros-nyappdiv-1979.