State Division of Human Rights v. Dorik's Au Natural Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Dorik's Au Natural Restaurant, Inc.

239 A.D.2d 158, 657 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D.2d 158 (State Division of Human Rights v. Dorik's Au Natural Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. Dorik's Au Natural Restaurant, Inc., 239 A.D.2d 158, 657 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 26, 1994, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Lisa Cotoggio the sum of $10,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition of enforcement (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.], entered July 26, 1996) granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order, without costs.

The findings of fact on which the order is based are supported by sufficient evidence in the record considered as a whole (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v APPLES, Inc., 169 AD2d 620). Respondents have not controverted petitioner’s allegation that they failed to comply with the Deputy Commissioner’s order, and they have not indicated that they will comply. Therefore, an enforcement order is warranted (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Morette, 210 AD2d 891). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 26, 1994, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Lisa Cotoggio the sum of $10,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition of enforcement (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.], entered July 26, 1996) granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order, without costs.

The findings of fact on which the order is based are supported by sufficient evidence in the record considered as a whole (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v APPLES, Inc., 169 AD2d 620). Respondents have not controverted petitioner’s allegation that they failed to comply with the Deputy Commissioner’s order, and they have not indicated that they will comply. Therefore, an enforcement order is warranted (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Morette, 210 AD2d 891). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 158, 657 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-doriks-au-natural-restaurant-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack