State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.

169 A.D.2d 620, 565 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 A.D.2d 620 (State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc., 169 A.D.2d 620, 565 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 23, 1989, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Olga M. Drum the sum of $2,602.12, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 14, 1981, unanimously confirmed, without costs, the petition of enforcement granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order.

This court had previously ordered respondents to comply with petitioner’s order directing them to compensate complainant upon a finding of sex discrimination. (Ill AD2d 133.) The within proceeding was solely concerned with determining the exact sum due the complainant. We find that the amount of compensation ordered by petitioner is supported by sufficient evidence as required by the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 298). Respondents having failed to comply with the order, the petition of enforcement is granted. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 23, 1989, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Olga M. Drum the sum of $2,602.12, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 14, 1981, unanimously confirmed, without costs, the petition of enforcement granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order.

This court had previously ordered respondents to comply with petitioner’s order directing them to compensate complainant upon a finding of sex discrimination. (Ill AD2d 133.) The within proceeding was solely concerned with determining the exact sum due the complainant. We find that the amount of compensation ordered by petitioner is supported by sufficient evidence as required by the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 298). Respondents having failed to comply with the order, the petition of enforcement is granted. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 620, 565 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-apples-inc-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack