State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.

169 A.D.2d 620, 565 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 23, 1989, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Olga M. Drum the sum of $2,602.12, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 14, 1981, unanimously confirmed, without costs, the petition of enforcement granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order.

This court had previously ordered respondents to comply with petitioner’s order directing them to compensate complainant upon a finding of sex discrimination. (Ill AD2d 133.) The within proceeding was solely concerned with determining the exact sum due the complainant. We find that the amount of compensation ordered by petitioner is supported by sufficient evidence as required by the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 298). Respondents having failed to comply with the order, the petition of enforcement is granted. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 23, 1989, which ordered respondents to pay complainant Olga M. Drum the sum of $2,602.12, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum from April 14, 1981, unanimously confirmed, without costs, the petition of enforcement granted, and respondents directed to comply with the aforesaid order.

This court had previously ordered respondents to comply with petitioner’s order directing them to compensate complainant upon a finding of sex discrimination. (Ill AD2d 133.) The within proceeding was solely concerned with determining the exact sum due the complainant. We find that the amount of compensation ordered by petitioner is supported by sufficient evidence as required by the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 298). Respondents having failed to comply with the order, the petition of enforcement is granted. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc., 169 A.D.2d 620, 565 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

169 A.D.2d 620 (State Division of Human Rights v. APPLES, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related